Writing, Typing, Keyboarding, Texting

There was a lot of off-line conversation among BlogHer editors a while back about the fact that today’s kids cannot read or write in cursive. I have more decades of experience will all forms of writing than any of those relative youngsters at BlogHer. Here are some reflections about how technology has affected me as a producer of words.

Everyone learned cursive when I was a kid. You weren’t allowed to print. As a public school teacher for a gazillion years myself, I taught cursive to my students. I can tell you exactly how to perfectly form any cursive letter. I was always one of those people who had “good” handwriting. Yet, now, when I do something like attend a writing workshop with Natalie Goldberg, where she won’t allow computers, I find it really difficult to write by hand. My cursive quickly turns to unreadable scribbling. And if I do write something worth using later, I still have to input it into my computer!

When I was in high school, we took Typing – with real typewriters. I was terrible at it. I think I still hold the record for the most mistakes on a 10 minute timed writing test for my high school. And correcting mistakes was very difficult. Anybody remember Wite Out? I had inch deep globs of Wite Out scattered over everything I typed.

When I made it to college and took journalism classes, my instructor insisted we compose at the typewriter. Thinking at the keyboard turned out to be easy for me and I’ve been composing at the keyboard ever since, unless forced to do otherwise. I was still a terrible typist, but I could correct my mistakes.

Later in college, I attempted to help my husband type his doctoral dissertation. On a typewriter. And it had to be perfect. No corrections. I had nightmares about that particular stress. That was before the self-correcting typewriters came along with built in white correction stuff on the ribbon.

I was out of college and busy teaching kids to write in cursive when the Apple IIe came into the school. Remember that? 64K of memory? The Oregon Trail on a big floppy disk? Yeah, that. I was hooked immediately.

When you type on a computer keyboard it is so easy to correct your mistakes. So easy. And it is so easy to edit, move, rearrange, and manipulate the words to improve them. That was it for me. I was sold.

Now I’m troubled when someone, even someone so wonderful as Natalie Goldberg, asks me to write by hand. I want my keyboard.

Texting is another art completely. The skill you develop depends on the type of phone you have. If you change phones, you may have to relearn the keyboard all over again for the new phone. The problem isn’t so much bad typing as fat fingers. Then there are the self-correcting smart phones, which can be hilariously wrong about what you meant.

My daughter talks to her Android phone and it sends text messages for her. That’s probably coming soon for computers. I’m not sure I’d be good at that. I’m not a good speaker. I’m somewhat more accomplished as a writer. I don’t have much luck saying what I really mean when I have to say it out loud. I can say it better with my fingers.

Writing, Typing, Keyboarding, Texting. Hand Hand Fingers Thumb. The technological progress of writing sounds like a Dr. Seuss book.

Review: HTML5 & CSS3 for the Real World


HTML5 & CSS3 For The Real World, written by Alexis Goldstein, Louis Lazaris and Estelle Weyl, is from Sitepoint (2011). This book takes on several topics that could fill an entire book individually, yet manages to serve each topic well. As you can tell from the title, the book talks about HTML5 and CSS3, but it also goes into complementary JavaScript/API topics like geolocation, offline web apps, web storage, Canvas, SVG, drag and drop.

 The authors specifically point to the growing mobile market, and that focus is reflected in the chapters included in the book. They say,
Mobile Safari on iOS devices like the iPhone and iPad, Opera Mini and Opera Mobile, as well as the Android operating system’s web browser all provide strong levels of HTML5 and CSS3 support. New features and technologies supported by some of those browser include CSS3 colors and opacity, the Canvas API, Web Storage, SVG, CSS3 rounded corners, Offline Web Apps, and more.

The authors made a strong effort to be as up to date as one can possibly be in a hardcopy format. They mentioned very recent changes in HTML5. They knew what future versions of browsers were likely to support, and therefore, what vendor specific prefixes were no longer needed, or soon would not be needed.

The downloadable site adds valuable practical and hands-on experience with the examples in the book that many learners will appreciate. It gives you something concrete to grapple with in addition to the theoretical information behind what’s going on in a browser or other device. Since I tend to look at everything from an educator’s point of view, I think the downloadable files would be a real asset if this book was used to teach either HTML5 or CSS3 or both.

It’s a lot for one book, but it’s all handled well. Which makes this book a decent choice for someone who wants a single resource to guide them through the new technologies and tools that are available in and around HTML5 and CSS3. I wouldn’t recommend it for someone who didn’t already understand HTML and CSS, but it is certainly a valuable book for learning the latest information in those fields.

Summary: An all-inclusive resource for learning HTML5 and CSS3.

A review by Virginia DeBolt of HTML5 & CSS3 for the Real World (rating: 5 stars)

Useful Links: Simple CSS, semantic web, EE

Chris at CSS Tricks has a great post in Little CSS Stuff Newcomers Get Confused About.

Bing Brings it On (RFDa, that is) at Semantic Web:

Bing webmaster help site that indicates Microsoft wants to play nice with whatever markup approach webmasters want to implement – microdata, microformats, or RDFa. The site mark-up overview on the page referenced says that Bing’s “crawlers do not prefer one specification over another. It’s entirely up to you to decide which of the supported specifications best fits your data.

Contrast that with Google’s initial commentary about the schema.org structured data markup schema.

If Expression Engine is your thing, or if you want to learn it, check out this series of EE Podcasts from Emily Lewis and Lea Alcantara.

Help kickstart this great project

Can you help with a few bucks for this kickstarter program to bring Sight.Sound.Soul. with Henry Butler to the Southwest Conference on Disability in October in Albuquerque. The Southwest Conference on Disability is,

one of the largest disability conferences in the country, will include hundreds of people with  disabilities – just the audience who will most appreciate the full accessibility of this rich sensory experience.

The kickstarter goal is $8100 and you can donate as little as $1 to help out.

FYI, Sharron Rush, Emily Lewis, Jason Nakai and I are going to do a panel presentation at this event about web accessibility. You’ll be hearing more about it.

Apps Against Abuse

The White House has challenged developers to develop apps that help prevent abuse. The announcement at Challenge.gov is called Apps Against Abuse.

The challengeVice President Biden and Secretary Sebelius are honored to announce a challenge that encourages the development of applications that provide college students and young adults with the tools to help prevent dating violence and sexual assault. The application envisioned will offer individuals a way to connect with trusted friends in real-time to prevent abuse or violence from occurring. While the application will serve a social function of helping people stay in touch with their friends, it will also allow friends to keep track of each other’s whereabouts and check in frequently to avoid being isolated in vulnerable circumstances.

Information about the challenge, the prizes, the judges, and details for how to enter are all at the above URL.

A little test to see what drives Flickr views

I took some photos at an Eliza Gilkyson concert the other day. I put a few of them up on Flickr. Here’s one:

Eliza Gilkyson

Then I did a little test to see what social networking tool would bring more views into my Flickr account. I sent one photo to Twitter, posted a different one on Facebook, and a still different one on Google+.

Only the one posted on Twitter brought in many views to Flickr. But, of course, the ones on Facebook and Google+ were full size on those sites and there was no need to click through to Flickr to see it.

Something I’ve noticed before when sending photos to Twitter, there’s no exploring in my photostream. People look at the one photo and leave. There are thumbnail photos in a column on the right of similar stuff. Even on an iPhone, you can see additional photos besides the one you’ve clicked to see. If people are interested enough in Eliza Gilkyson to click through from Twitter, why aren’t they curious about other photos in the same photostream that are obviously related? If they look at photo on Facebook or Google+ that says, “took a bunch of photos at a concert – here’s one,” is there no incentive to see more?

This little test doesn’t prove much. I sound a little like I’m complaining, but I’m not. I’m just wondering. I’m not spending any time trying to get traffic to my Flickr photos; that is not one of my goals at all.

But . . . what if I were trying to get some recognition as a photographer? Is sharing on social media the best way to do that? What is the strategy used by photographers who want a following?

How To Automatically Create A WordPress Post from Your Tweets

We’re in a time where Twitter and Facebook have taken over the world. It’s pretty safe to say that almost every active Internet user has an account on one or the other or even both. Not a day goes by where I don’t see Twitter mentioned on a TV show (especially reality shows) or a commercial.

Twitter is the new way to find out what’s going on in the world and many people even use it much like a blog. They share interesting links that they’ve found, post inspiring quotes, talk about TV shows, give their opinions about breaking news and celebrity scandals, and much more. With all of this posting, why not create blog posts from your tweets and share with your readers? It only make sense since that’s where the real content is being posted.

Well that’s why the WordPress plugin Twitter Tools was created. It not only allows you to display in the sidebar of your blog and automatically post new blog posts to Twitter, but it also lets you create a blog post from your tweets. Let’s take a look at how this works.

Getting Started

After installing and activating the plugin, you’ll need to update the Twitter Tools settings in your blog dashboard. The first step here is registering your blog as a Twitter app. This is done by filling out a fairly simple registration form.

Twitter App Registration

After completing your registration, you’ll need to copy and paste 4 things into the Twitter Tools settings: consumer key, consumer secret, access token, and access token secret. Finally, click on “Connect to Twitter” button in WordPress.

If all goes well, you should be taken to a new set of options with the message, “Yay! We connected with Twitter” at the top of the page.

Create Individual Posts

This next page of settings that you see is where set up WordPress to create a new blog post for each of your tweets. You’ll want to skip down to where it says, “create a blog post from each of your tweets” and select “yes.”

Next you’ll need to enter the category for your blog posts. If you don’t already have a category that you want to use, you can create one and then come back and select it from the drop down menu.

Twitter Tools Settings

Next you can enter tags to be automatically attached to each of your blog posts. If you have multiple authors on your blog, you can select the author’s name that you want attached to each of the blog posts. Lastly, you can choose whether or not to include @replies. It’s probably a good idea to leave this to “no” since @replies are more personal and less important.

You can see an actual blog post below. This will of course look different depending on your theme, but you get the general idea.

Blog Post

Create a Digest

In addition to creating a new blog post from each of your tweets, you can also choose to create a daily or weekly digest for your tweets. So instead of having an individual blog post for each of your tweets, this will put all of your tweets for the day or week into a single post.

If you tweet a lot, this is definitely your best option. It will create less posts on your blog (and RSS feed) and I’m sure your subscribers would much rather read 1 post a day or week dedicated to your tweets, rather than 20+ a day to 100+ a week.

Create a Digest

Lastly, you can setup a title for your digest and choose the order of your tweets.

Additional Options

The Twitter Tools WordPress plugin also comes with 3 other plugins: bit.ly URLs, exclude category, and hashtags. These are all deactivated by default. These can be used to enhance Twitter Tools and are mainly for those who are creating tweets from blog posts. So if you decide to automatically post new blog posts to Twitter with Twitter Tools, be sure to check out these additional options as well.

This guest post was kindly sent and written by Lior Levin who is an advisor to a psd to css company  that does psd conversions. Lior also works with the main security  faculty in Tel Aviv University.