Useful Links: Transcripts, HTML5, IE/Google, Harley, Mighty Meeting

Transcripts on the Web: Getting people to your podcasts and videos at uiAccess provides valuable resources for creating transcripts of audio and video.

My (current) opinions on HTML5 from Dori Smith is a reflection on the writhing mass of eels known as HTML5 and what has happened in that arena in the last few days. Dori has some ideas about what the lack of accord among the people working in this area may mean in future real world terms.

Microsoft admits Explorer used in Google China hack from the BBC explains what Internet Explorer 6 had to do with the recent attack on Google from Chinese hackers, and what Microsoft is doing to help fix it.

Harley unveils “Pink Label” line of merchandise makes me think maybe Harley wasn’t watching when Dell tried to come out with a line of “girly” computers.

Mighty Meeting Lets You Conduct PowerPoint Presentations from your SmartPhone. Remember, oh a couple of years back, when conferences were a sea of laptops and the speaker needed a big projector and a couple of people on hand to make sure all the computers worked with the projector? All gone.

Useful Links: On Google and China

Evan Osnos’ Dispatches from China in The New Yorker include “Q. and A.: Google and China.”

Google China Employees Given Holiday Leave, Networks Being Scrutinized is by Robin Wauters at TechCrunch.

At Bloomberg News, China’s response to Google is reported in China Says Internet Firms Abiding by Its Laws Welcome (Update1)

Related Posts: Framing the Google Disagreement with China.

Framing the Google disagreement with China

After three years in China, during which Google accepted the Chinese government’s demands for censored search, Google is changing its position. Yesterday on the official Google Blog in  “A New Approach to China.”

We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

Google gave three reasons for the new approach.

  1. Sophisticated cyber attacks on Google and 20 other companies coming from China.
  2. Google has evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.
  3. Dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. Google is quick to point out that the accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users’ computers.

The post concluded with,

We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

Google did not say they were pulling out of China immediately. Only that they were going to stop censoring search results and would talk to the Chinese government about it to determine the next steps.

It’s instructive to look at the immediate response to the news. It was cheered and sneered, and overblown with disregard for what Google actually said. Many framed it as the honorable American corporation that promised to do no evil vs. the big bad government. Look at this tweet or this one or this one. Places like Buzzbox aggregated stories about the news, showing headlines ranging from “Furious Google throws down gauntlet to China over censorship” to “How Much Will it Cost Google to Exit China?” The New York Times, The Guardian, Business Week—everyone was scrambling to learn more and expand on the story with more information than the official blog post contained. In the absence of much more information, the initial reactions on Twitter, in particular, was to spin it and spin it without much checking back to what the official blog post actually said.

It’s instructive to realize that Google is so important in the world that any news from them, especially something as amazing as a corporation taking a stand on possible human rights violations, is recognized by everyone as a really big deal. Just how powerful is Google, anyway? What will China do?

Is there any possibility that any corporation interested in doing no evil could have as much influence on American politics as the currently influential profit-driven corporations who call the shots? Now that would be something to see.

Exploring the mind of the Internet beginner

The search for information was explored from two ends of the age spectrum in “Helping Children Find What they Need on the Internet” at The New York Times and “Where’s my Googlebox?!” – adventures in search for silver surfers at iheni :: making the web worldwide.

The Google research reported on in the NYT focused on search terminology problems among children. The article pointed out,

Google has long known that it can be difficult for users to formulate the right keywords to call up their desired results. But that task can be even more challenging for children, given that they do not always have the right context for thinking about a new subject.

The research reported at iheni was done by Opera, the browser company. Here’s the introduction to that report,

I forget that at its core the web is all about ”search” so it was humbling and eye opening to spend two days in the company of 8 silver surfers aged 60 to 80 testing Opera desktop and observing, amongst other things, how they went about carrying out searches.

It’s more or less the first skill you learn when you’re new to the web (our testers had between a month and 18 months experience each) and by far the most essential. It took me right back to how I felt when I first used the web and it was fascinating to watch how people tried to differentiate between web content, a browser and a search engine, often getting it wrong but for entirely for logical reasons. Our testers all came from the analogue world with little or no experience using computers.

The Google report talked about the fact that a child had problems searching on a question about when the President’s birthday would be next year. The child didn’t realize he needed to know when the President’s birthday was before he could learn when that day would fall next year. Is this a problem that only a child would have, or would an older beginner to the Internet not realize you couldn’t just search for “when is the President’s birthday next year” and get an answer?

The Opera study found that participants had a hard time distinguishing between the search field in the web page, the browser address box and the browser search box. To Opera’s credit, they did not try to say that only the older adults they tested would have these problems. The report did have an ageist slant, but it also pointed out that these were issues belonging to beginners. Do children have problems distinguishing between the function of various search boxes found in browser windows and chrome? I’m guessing yes.

Once you know what you are doing, it’s really hard to remember how to think like a beginner and help beginners learn the basics. In my opinion, age is not a factor in beginner’s mind. That’s why articles like Opening a Window on the Mac or Fill Forms Quickly with the Tab Key are so important on the Internet. Check the positive response to my TGB Elder Geek post on the CSS border property at Time Goes By. The 60 to 80 year old crowd reading that blog don’t seem afflicted by age, only by beginner’s mind.

I’m not an expert on the beginner’s mind, but I don’t think its age dependent, especially with something so non-intuitive as the Internet. The article about the Google study reported some ideas that Google in working on to make search easier. It would be good if thinking like that were applied to everything about the Internet and the way we approach it.

Cross posted at BlogHer.
Related posts: CSS3, Silver Surfer Humbug.

Useful Links: Textbooks by Sony, Ads by . . . you, A mashup of youness

Blyth education, a Canadian high school, announced that they will replace textbooks with Sony Readers. When U.S. schools tried to do this with the Kindle Reader, they were hit with accessibility lawsuits. Be interesting to see how it goes with the Sony Reader.

The Medium is No Longer the Message–You Are is an article at TechCrunch by the co-founder of socialmedia.com. The article itself is interesting, but the real significance behind it is what is happening to advertising at socialmedia.com. You should check out what this company is doing. Advertising will never be the same.

Post and Read via Twitter API combines Twitter with WordPress. The Twitter app Tweetie will be the first app to provide you with the ability tweet directly to your WordPress blog. This article puts me in mind of Posterous: My New Social Media Addition. Posterous offers a life streaming mashup of everything you post from everywhere. In some situations I can see a lot of value in these efforts to combine social media into one big bundle of youness, but I also think there are times when streams of information are best kept separate. What do you think?

10 red balloons and the Darpa network challenge

Looking for Balloons and Insights to Online Behavior is an absolutely fascinating idea from DARPA, the Pentagon’s research agency. You can win $40,000 by finding 10 red balloons that could be anywhere in the Continental United States.

This is similar to the Wired story involving the attempted vanishing act by Evan Ratliff. Wired only offered $5000 for its social media experiment.

Called the DARPA Network Challenge, registration ended on November 23. The contest itself begins on December 5. The first person to send in the latitude and longitude of all 10 red balloons wins the big bucks. Here’s how DARPA explains what they are up to:

. . . explore the roles the Internet and social networking play in the timely communication, wide-area team-building, and urgent mobilization required to solve broad-scope, time-critical problems.

I can’t wait to see how long it takes real-time social media to put this information together for some lucky winner (or winners, if people decide to cooperate in order to win). You can follow news of the contest on Twitter @DARPA_News.

Useful links: beautiful HTML, unfriend, e-expectations, Facebook gods

What beautiful HTML looks like from CSS Tricks is a PNG image. It’s a little hard to read at browser size, but I can imagine it at poster size on a classroom wall, where it would be very useful and instructive.

Oxford Word of the Year is “unfriend.”

“It has both currency and potential longevity,” notes Christine Lindberg, Senior Lexicographer for Oxford’s US dictionary program. “In the online social networking context, its meaning is understood, so its adoption as a modern verb form makes this an interesting choice for Word of the Year. Most “un-” prefixed words are adjectives (unacceptable, unpleasant), and there are certainly some familiar “un-” verbs (uncap, unpack), but “unfriend” is different from the norm. It assumes a verb sense of “friend” that is really not used (at least not since maybe the 17th century!). Unfriend has real lex-appeal.”

Other technology related words that Oxford considered this year include hashtag, intexticated, netbook, paywall, and sexting.

Scrolling Toward Enrollment: Web Site Content and the E-Expectations of College-Bound Seniors (pdf) uncovers the online expectations and behavior of college-bound seniors.

The Facebook Gods is a romp. You need a little Facebook humor today, don’t you?