Bright idea from bit.ly: link bundles

The URL shortening service bit.ly announced Bit.ly Bundles on their blog yesterday. Now, instead of sending one link with a shortened URL, you can send a whole bundle of links.

When you click the bundled link, it opens up in a special Bit.ly Bundles page where you get a rich media preview of every link in the bundle. Here’s an example suggested by bit.ly using this URL: http://bit.ly/9kfiz3. It links to Jauntsetter’s Best of Washington D.C.

This is a way to aggregate, curate, and organize a variety of information on a topic. A bundle of links to your best Thanksgiving recipes, multiple links to the latest announcement from Apple, multiple links to the hottest news in shoelaces – whatever – you get the idea. You click the link, you go the the Bundle page, you choose what you want to read in full.

The Bundle page has a comment box for reactions from people who use the page. And stats showing how many times the page has been viewed.

Nice. Cool, even.

Cool, provided you’re one of the people who don’t mind clicking on shortened URLs. Since a shortened URL doesn’t tell you much about where the link will take you, many people are wary of them. Now the shortened URL can blindside you with even more mystery links. What’s your opinion on that?

How to use it

Want to make a bundle of links?

To make a bit.ly bundle, go to bit.ly and register. It’s free, it’s easy. As a registered user, you can create bundles of links.

Enter your links in a form, then click Bundle. A new page opens where you add titles and other material to your bundle. On this page, you can add or remove links, rearrange links, add titles and descriptions. Then view it or share it. I made a bundle called Places to watch web series programs. Click the link to see the Bundle page. The link I just used is the shortened bit.ly link, which is quick to copy as an option on the bit.ly page. The Share button lets me tweet the link or share to Facebook.

All you need is to register and have an idea for some links you’d like to share in a bundle. Very easy.

The bit.ly bundle page reminds me of what you see when you use paper.li to create a paper from a Twitter list. It’s meant to look good and be engaging. Bit.ly wants you to regard the page as a resource where you’ll stay a while, and perhaps even leave a comment.

What do you think? Are you going to give it a try?

Cross-posted in slightly different form at BlogHer.

You’ve got messages

On Monday Facebook announced a new system of messaging that will be integrated within Facebook. Facebook calls it seamless messaging because it will dump your email, IMs, text messages, and Facebook messages into one Message inbox. The new Messages folder will be organized by Friends.

I wrote about Facebook Messages at BlogHer, explaining how it works, what the potential privacy issues are, and whether I think it will be a Gmail killer. Read the full article.

Klout – what’s it to ya?

Klout.com, a service that has measured a person’s influence and reach on Twitter, just added Facebook to its Klout calculations.

The alliance with Facebook was announced in Do You Have Facebook Klout? Here’s a bit of their explanation about how it will work.

On Facebook, like Twitter, we assess how conversations and content generate interest and engagement. Facebook allows users to post many different types of content, view multiple streams and interact with their friends in more complex ways than we’ve previously seen. We’ve made sure each action and reaction is individually assessed to ensure we give you the most accurate picture of your Klout.

At Pureconent, Catherine explained

To determine level of influence, Klout uses various data points which they then compile into what they call a ‘Klout Score’, which is intended to represent the user’s online influence and ability to compel others to action. On Twitter, Klout uses things such as retweets, number of followers, list memberships, and unique mentions to calculate a user’s ‘true reach’. Now it is applying the same methodology to Facebook.

Apparently, it is more complex to add in a consideration of Facebook influence than simply scoring for Twitter influence – it takes 72 hours to get a score with your Facebook klout. Twitter scores are returned instantly. Connecting your Facebook account to your Klout account will not lower your Klout score, according to the announcement.

Who Needs Klout?

While it’s clean ego-tickling fun to look at your own Klout, the service is not really meant for individuals who simply want to know how they’re doing. Its core reason for being is to help businesses find influencers who can drive action. In other words, you can see other peoples Klout without their permission. (The better to look for those influencers you’re seeking, my dear.) According to Klout Adds Facebook Data to Its Influence Graph

Measuring influence isn’t just something that Klout wants to do in order to make users feel good about themselves, or so it can give them badges for passing certain milestones (although it does that as well). The reality is that as social media and social networks have become a larger and larger phenomenon, marketing agencies and companies have become increasingly interested in using these networks and services to target specific demographics, and to target “influencers” within specific topic areas who can help spread their message.

Not just business, but other seeking to influence events (such as nonprofits or social justice groups) can also make use of Klout.

Nonprofit maven Beth Kanter has written about social influence several times. In Can Social Network Analysis Improve Your Social Media Strategy? she mentions a number of tools other than Klout that can be used to map and measure influence. Beth does include Klout in her post about finding and cultivating the movers and shakers in your area of interest, Twitter Tip for Networked Nonprofits: Follow the Few To Get To the Many. Beth said on The Huffington Post that its about more than just the numbers.

It also helps to understand how networks work and apply that understanding to analyzing the relationships in your network, using social network analysis tools. Then you know who the influencers are and you can formulate and executive an effective strategy based on finding and cultivating them.

Numbers don’t matter as much building relationships one person at a time. The bottom line is to focus on the results of your social media strategy, don’t get distracted by meaningless metrics like the number of followers.

My Klout Before Facebook

I’ll use myself as an example, although I’m not an influencer with much Klout.
However, I’m willing to reveal my data as your guinea pig. I signed up with Klout and looked at my score from my Twitter account. My score was 21. That’s on a scale of 1-100. Along with that raw number, I was given all sorts of charts, like the following one, that explain various aspects of what that number means. This chart shows something called “true reach.”

klout-trueReach

Like several other charts at Klout, the true reach chart is a dynamic chart. Different results are displayed for True Reach depending on what I click from the bar across the bottom where it says TrueReach, Followers, Friends, Mentions %, and Retweet %.

I also see a list of who I’m influenced by.

klout-InfluencedBy

Knowing who I’m influenced by isn’t so important to me as an individual – I already know who I’m influenced by. But – and this is a big but – you can look at other people’s Klout scores. All you need is their Twitter username. if you were looking at someone else’s klout results for potential influencers to add to your social network or community, this list of influencers could be very valuable to you.

Klout also wants to help you find influential people. It shows me where it thinks I’m missing a bet with some followers I should follow back.

klout-influenceNetwork

My Klout After Facebook

I linked my Klout account to my Facebook account and sat back to wait for 72 hours for some results. Facebook isn’t my big thing – I use it because I have to for work. I’m not very connected on Facebook and don’t friend people unless I actually know them, so I was counting on Klout’s promise that my score would not suffer an embarrassing drop after adding in the Facebook data.

It didn’t drop, but it didn’t go up either.

klout achievements

New badges appeared that seem to reflect action on Facebook. The badges for Total Likes, Total Comments, and Unique Commenters were the only thing I could find that was different in my results after the addition of Facebook.

Are you helped by Klout?

Knowing my Klout score isn’t much use to me or anyone else, but I’m not trying to start a movement, raise awareness about an issue, collect money for natural distaster relief or find the people who might convince someone that my product is the best thing to buy. If I was doing any of those things, it would be smart to go looking for influencers on Klout so I could build a relationship with them.

Do you use Klout? Does the addition of Facebook to the scoring process make it even more valuable to you?

Cross posted at BlogHer.

My Week Watching Grace Hopper from a Land Far, Far Away

The Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing is over for 2010. There was considerable enthusiasm for the event coming out of Atlanta in the form of tweets, blog posts, and photographs. Here’s a taste of what I saw from afar. If you were there and can provide additional links and photos, please leave a comment.

GHC10 banquet

Attendance was good as you can see in the banquet room photo. Summer tweeted the stats.

GHC 2010 stats: 960 students, 2147 attendees, 280 schools, 29 countries, 630 speakers, and infinite fun! #ghc10Wed Sep 29 22:28:50 via Twitter for iPhone

Grace Hopper 2010-30 dance party

They had a dance party. And they loved it. Gail Carmichael took photos and wrote about it in Dancing with Hundreds of Technical Women at Grace Hopper.

When I tell someone about the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, I start by explaining the dance parties. I tell them, “You wouldn’t think that an all-female dance would be fun… but you’d be wrong. There’s nothing like dancing with hundreds of technical women who let loose because there’s nobody around to feel stupid in front of.”

Not to make less of the dance party fun, but I’ll be happy to see the day when technical women can dance like nobody’s watching at a conference where there are men with everybody dancing to the same techno tune.

Reports on some of the sessions and panels made it into the Grace Hopper Bloggers blog. In addition to posting some bloggers on the site, there is a page called GHC Bloggers that lists blog posts from everyone blogging about the event on their own blogs. Cate posted a summary of what she did at CompSciWoman.

There’s a group pool on Flickr for photos. You can find additional photos on Flickr from Gail-Carmichael, geeklinda, and Terriko. Professional photos by US Event Photos are on Flickr. Musicword put her photos in a Picasa Album.

Grace Hopper 2010-11 free and open source table

As you might expect, there was representation from the Open Source community. In fact, there was an Open Source Codeathon. Read The Open Source Codeathon for Humanity (a blog post in pictures) by Terriko.

. . . building on some success last year, we had a codeathon at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing. This year, we were working on Sahana Eden, a free and open source disaster management system.

There was some doubt at Geek Feminism Blog prior to hearing the keynote by Duy-Loan Le from Texas Instruments. After the speech, vaurora posted Grace Hopper 2010 keynote update: Now “Cross-boundary Collaboration” with a more favorable opinion about it.

Kami from Nuh Likkle Bickle was Excited about the poken

Cool feature: Poken! They’re futuristic business cards, you hold them up to each other and they exchange sort of your business cards, but even more if you add social networks to your profile.

Kimberly Blessing gets the last word.

How does #ghc just get better and better each year? Because of @anitaborg_org and this awesome, GROWING community of women and men! #ghc10Sat Oct 02 02:40:21 via web

Additional information:

Photo credits: Gail Carmichael (Gail-Carmichael on Flickr), Linda Goldstein (geeklinda on Flickr)

Cross-posted in slightly different form at BlogHer.

Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing begins today

GHC10 is the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing for 2010. It runs from Sept. 28 to Oct. 2 in Atlanta. The conference is sold out, which is a wonderful thing to hear. This video from 1986 lets you learn something about Grace Hopper — like why she deserves to have a conference named after her — and be entertained at the same time.

For complete details on how to follow the conference events, see my post GHC10: Going? Watching? Here’s where to watch from home at BlogHer. I also created a daily paper for the #ghc10 hashtag at The #ghc10 Daily Newspaper.

New Twitter

On BlogHer today, The New Twitter: Is It Better? It’s a quick look at reactions to the new Twitter home page from the blogosphere. Here’s an excerpt:

In my scan of reactions to the new Twitter, I didn’t see much immediate attention and response to the money-making possibilities of the new look for Twitter. Business pundits will tackle this issue very soon, I’m sure. Look at the points I did mention:

  • embedded video
  • realtime search
  • links
  • breaking news
  • plain old social networking

That looks like a list of everything you want in one place. Add on some revenue for Twitter and you’ve got a pretty hot property. Was it only two or three years ago that we first heard about Twitter and thought, “Who gives a damn what some guy in Hackensack is doing right now?”

Get the full story at BlogHer.

Google Search is now Google Instant

Google Instant. It’s new and it’s fast. Google announced it with the headline Search: now faster than the speed of type.

Here’s how it works. You start typing something in the Google search box. The instant you start typing, Google shows you suggestions for what it thinks you are looking for. The more you type, the closer the suggestions come to what you want. As soon as you see the one you want, you arrow down to it and don’t have to type any more.

To get to BlogHer, you have to type “blogh” before you see BlogHer.

Google Instant needed blogh to suggest blogher

Actually, you don’t even have to arrow down to the choice you want. While you’re typing, search results show up below the search box. The search results change with each letter typed. When I reached the point of typing “blogh”, these were the search results I saw.

Google Instant Search Results before typing is finished

Here’s a Google video showing it in action. Feel free to sing along.

Twitter was immediate flooded with tweets about what a great thing it was and how fast it was. For most people, it was love at first sight.

I am in love with you, Google Instant! You started making life easier before I knew what the hell you were!Wed Sep 08 19:04:30 via TweetDeck

There were the inevitable jokers, too. You can rely on Twitter for that.

Google Instant-er…I think the only step left is for Google to call you and simply tell you what you want.Wed Sep 08 19:04:59 via Twitter for iPhone

There were even a few notes of caution.

Anyone else find Google Instant a bit scary? Especially when you make spelling mistakes without safe search on….Wed Sep 08 19:05:32 via web

Almost the moment it was released, the opinions started flying about what the implications of Google Instant might be. One blogger said, Google Instant Makes SEO Irrelevant.

Now, with this, everyone is going to start tweaking their searches in real-time. The reason this is a game changer is feedback. When you get feedback, you change your behaviors.

Headstrong Capitalism disagreed in Google Instant Thoughts $GOOG with,

It changes the game, SEO will now focus on individual letter combinations and not full words.

Lifehacker, bless ’em, posted an article about How to Turn Off Google Instant Search.

According to Google’s About Google Instant page, it may take a few days before everyone sees it on their Google search page.

Here’s a challenge for you, suggested by the Bob Dylan video from Google. If you knew “you’re the poetry man” was a lyric by Phoebe Snow, how many seconds (or milleseconds) would it take Google Instant to find you the complete lyrics? And what would you have to type to find it? Did you have to spell it right – I made a typo trying it – didn’t seem to matter.

Have you tried Google Instant? What did you think?

[Cross-posted at BlogHer.]