<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Adobe, Here&#8217;s an idea for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webteacher.ws/2009/02/08/dear-adobe-heres-an-idea-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webteacher.ws/2009/02/08/dear-adobe-heres-an-idea-for-you/</link>
	<description>Tips, web design book reviews, resources and observations for teaching and learning web development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:36:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Fegette</title>
		<link>http://www.webteacher.ws/2009/02/08/dear-adobe-heres-an-idea-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5460</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Fegette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webteacher.ws/?p=2107#comment-5460</guid>
		<description>Hi, Virginia-
Thanks for the post.  Michael has a great point- feature sets for DW are largely driven by demand, so often the fastest path to a specific implementation is when the third-party community jumps on it first (i.e. the extension suggestion).  Right now we&#039;re keeping an eye on RDFa but there isn&#039;t much demand for it coming through the official channels yet - I&#039;m certainly going to be watching how that progresses, however.

Sorry I missed you at WDN!  I wasn&#039;t able to arrive until the day after the workshops, unfortunately.

-Scott, Adobe Systems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Virginia-<br />
Thanks for the post.  Michael has a great point- feature sets for DW are largely driven by demand, so often the fastest path to a specific implementation is when the third-party community jumps on it first (i.e. the extension suggestion).  Right now we&#8217;re keeping an eye on RDFa but there isn&#8217;t much demand for it coming through the official channels yet &#8211; I&#8217;m certainly going to be watching how that progresses, however.</p>
<p>Sorry I missed you at WDN!  I wasn&#8217;t able to arrive until the day after the workshops, unfortunately.</p>
<p>-Scott, Adobe Systems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdebolt</title>
		<link>http://www.webteacher.ws/2009/02/08/dear-adobe-heres-an-idea-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5458</link>
		<dc:creator>vdebolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webteacher.ws/?p=2107#comment-5458</guid>
		<description>Mike, When I wrote that letter, I was actually thinking that it would be very nice if Project Seven or some other Dreamweaver extension maker created an extension for RDF. It could happen a lot faster than building it into the next Adobe Creative Suite version, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, When I wrote that letter, I was actually thinking that it would be very nice if Project Seven or some other Dreamweaver extension maker created an extension for RDF. It could happen a lot faster than building it into the next Adobe Creative Suite version, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael(tm) Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.webteacher.ws/2009/02/08/dear-adobe-heres-an-idea-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5456</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael(tm) Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webteacher.ws/?p=2107#comment-5456</guid>
		<description>Hi Virginia,

I forwarded a link for posting to some friends. (Thanks for quoting me, by the way.)

I&#039;d suggest that one great way to demonstrate to Adobe the value of adding RDFa support to Dreamweaver would be for somebody to first write a third-party RDFs plugin for Dreamweaver, and to then track how many people actually download and install and use that -- and to get the word out by having Web-technologies teacher/trainers and book/article writers talk about the RDFs plugin in their work.

I do realize that it could take a while to get the word out and to much data back on how much it is used. But pragmatically speaking, I think it might get into Dreamweaver natively much more quickly that way than it would if we just depend on waiting for Adobe to add it.

On a somewhat related note, you might be interested in taking a look at the following:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0032.html

It&#039;s a message from Larry Masinter of Adobe, about head@profile support in Dreamweaver.

  --Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Virginia,</p>
<p>I forwarded a link for posting to some friends. (Thanks for quoting me, by the way.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest that one great way to demonstrate to Adobe the value of adding RDFa support to Dreamweaver would be for somebody to first write a third-party RDFs plugin for Dreamweaver, and to then track how many people actually download and install and use that &#8212; and to get the word out by having Web-technologies teacher/trainers and book/article writers talk about the RDFs plugin in their work.</p>
<p>I do realize that it could take a while to get the word out and to much data back on how much it is used. But pragmatically speaking, I think it might get into Dreamweaver natively much more quickly that way than it would if we just depend on waiting for Adobe to add it.</p>
<p>On a somewhat related note, you might be interested in taking a look at the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0032.html" rel="nofollow">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0032.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a message from Larry Masinter of Adobe, about head@profile support in Dreamweaver.</p>
<p>  &#8211;Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
